These Are Some Of The Worst Muscle Cars Ever Released

Muscle cars are unique, exciting and fun. But not all muscle cars were created equal and throughout the span of time, there were bound to be some designs that fell through the cracks.

Sometimes the car as a whole is bad and other times there are only certain generations and years that are failures. As car manufacturers and enthusiasts push the limit further and further, we expect to see more interesting muscle cars in the future. Until then, here are some of the worst muscle cars from the past.

1976-77 Dodge Charger Daytona

Charger
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons

Produced specifically for NASCAR racing, the Dodge Charger Daytona was designed to be faster than the other Chargers in the Dodge lineup. The body of the car was made pointier and more aerodynamic and in the late 1960s, the car was really impressive.

However, in the late 1970s, Dodge tried to rebrand a Chrysler Cordoba and make no changes to it whatsoever. The car was slow, ugly and poorly received by the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

1970s Era Oldsmobile Cutlass

ADVERTISEMENT
Cutlass
Alexander Körner/picture alliance via Getty Images
Alexander Körner/picture alliance via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Oldsmobile Cutlass was originally designed as part of Oldsmobile's entry to the muscle car lineup. As the company itself started to struggle financially, a lot of last-minute big changes were made to try and scavenge any profits.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unfortunately what was once a promising muscle car quickly became just a Chevrolet Malibu with a name change and new badging. The engine of the car was also identical to the Chevrolet Malibu and long gone was the V8 that the Oldsmobile originally sported.

ADVERTISEMENT

1982 Pontiac Firebird

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
DmdAijSV4AArh4Z
Twitter/@BBW_BFF
Twitter/@BBW_BFF
ADVERTISEMENT

This mismatch of a car was a major letdown in 1982. A lot of car companies were big into name branding engineering which meant that they would use the same car and rename it for a different effect.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Pontiac Firebird was no better and it was essentially a Chevrolet Camaro with a red paint job and a new badge. Pontiac only slightly changed the body style of the car and buyers could still expect the same engine as the Camaro.

ADVERTISEMENT

1994 Ford Mustang

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1994 Ford Mustang worst muscle cars
Instagram/@cantgowrongwithacar
Instagram/@cantgowrongwithacar
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Mustang has had many generations that failed before Ford realized their mistakes and started making cars that people could actually enjoy. The 1994 Mustang was just another one of their complete fails because of the car's small changes.

ADVERTISEMENT

On the outside, the car barely had any updates to its body and it just looked like the same Mustang we had all been accustomed to. Under the hood, the Mustang had an even sadder engine that only had a V6 engine that got under 150 horsepower.

ADVERTISEMENT

1993 Chevy Camaro

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1993 Chevy Camaro worst muscle cars
Instagram/@tver.spotter
Instagram/@tver.spotter
ADVERTISEMENT

The Camaro saw most of its biggest body changes come with the introduction of its 1993 model. Long gone were the days of the aggressive stance of the Camaro and now Chevy introduced it to a more rounded and softer frame.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Camaro also had lackluster power and came standard with a V6 engine that only had 160 horsepower. Luckily the Camaro was still built on the same F-body platform so better changes were just around the corner.

ADVERTISEMENT

1995 Chevy Monte Carlo

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
06-1995-Chevrolet-Monte-Carlo.jpg copy
Chevrolet
Chevrolet
ADVERTISEMENT

This car was just one of many disappointments in the 1990s for the muscle car community. Chevy decided to bring the Monte Carlo back after it took a seven-year hiatus but it came back worse than when it went out.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Monte Carlo didn't have a V8 option nor did it have many updates to its body making the changes unimpressive and bland. To make matters worse, the Monte Carlo would remain mostly unchanged for the remainder of the decade until the 2000s.

ADVERTISEMENT

1974 Pontiac GTO

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Pontiac GTO worst muscle cars
Getty Images
Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Pontiac GTO has been considered one of the first muscle cars on the road and while it is highly regarded and respected for what it has done for auto history, its 1974 model was a major disappointment.

ADVERTISEMENT

It came with a great engine and was still faster than a lot of the other cars on the road in the 1970s. What caused the downfall of the GTO was Pontiac's decision to make the car slower and make body changes to it that were unappealing.

ADVERTISEMENT

1982 Pontiac Trans Am

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1982_pontiac_trans_am_15729512905ef66e7dff9f98764d1982_pontiac_trans_am_1572951289565ef66e7dff9f98bbd3efa6-cb93-456f-abfc-055a04d18576-UwUMMH.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

On the outside, you could say that the 1982 Pontiac Trans Am had an aggressive look. It had a futuristic design and was even featured alongside David Hasselhoff in the show Knight Rider.

ADVERTISEMENT

While the 1982 Trans Am had so much potential, the car ultimately fell short in performance. Its standard engine only produced a measly 90 horsepower and even if a driver did opt-out for the bigger engine the horsepower only went up to 165.

ADVERTISEMENT

1976 Chevrolet Camaro

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1976_chevrolet_camaro_1976_chevrolet_camaro_4f7f8d2a-239e-4d5e-afbd-e0c056c17e9b-O799L0-17765-17766-scaled.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

The Chevrolet Camaro is still a top-selling muscle car today but its mid-1970s model was one of its worst. By the 1970s, the Chevrolet Camaro lost most of its performance due to dropping its more powerful engine and going to a more fuel-efficient 5.0 liter.

ADVERTISEMENT

Outside of its performance, Chevrolet also made changes to the body of the Camaro resulting in a bumper that destroyed the car's aerodynamic abilities.

ADVERTISEMENT

1978 Ford Mustang King Cobra

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1978 Ford Mustang King Cobra worst muscle cars
Instagram/@pbm_89_gt
Instagram/@pbm_89_gt
ADVERTISEMENT

One of the worst models in the Ford Mustang history, the King Cobra was a Pinto with Ford badging. The car got a new paint job and a snake decal that made it look really cool on the road but ultimately it wasn't special or very good.

ADVERTISEMENT

The engine was another let down and didn't offer the driver much in power. Only a limited amount of Cobras were made and then Ford made major changes to the models in the following year.

ADVERTISEMENT

1976-80 Plymouth Volare Road Runner

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Plymouth Volare Road Runner worst muscle cars
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images via Getty Images
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Initially, the Plymouth was a road hog and was really impressive on the track. It looked good and under the hood, it was sporting the 426 Hemi engine and had 160 horsepower.

ADVERTISEMENT

Once it came to the Volare Road Runner, all of the things that made the Plymouth great were removed and its performance was greatly depleted. On top of poor performance, the car also was majorly recalled due to a number of them rusting underneath, indicating poor attention to detail.

ADVERTISEMENT

1967 Buick Gran Sport

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Buick Gran Sport worst muscle cars
Instagram/@streetcarmafiaofficial
Instagram/@streetcarmafiaofficial
ADVERTISEMENT

The Buick Gran Sport was Buick's attempt at making a muscle car similar to the GSX. The car was heavy and weighed down because of its size and extra mass.

ADVERTISEMENT

It wasn't remotely aerodynamic so it went slow even with the engine putting out 175 horsepower. On a scale, the car weighed nearly two tons which was too much even for sedans or trucks at that time. Because of this, the Gran Sport became obsolete and sales started to increasingly fall.

ADVERTISEMENT

1970 Chevy Camaro

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1976 Chevrolet Camaro worst muscle cars
Instagram/@_wicked_whips
Instagram/@_wicked_whips
ADVERTISEMENT

Chevy upgraded the Camaro in 1970 with a new model that somehow wasn't as fun to drive as the previous model. Although the new engine was technically better, it ended up turning the Camaro into a commuter car than a muscle masterpiece.

ADVERTISEMENT

As one reviewer wrote, "Somehow, though, the Z/28 is not as thrilling as it once was. It's more tolerant to driving techniques now, more mature in its behavior. All things considered, it's a better engine now but the loss of a care­free and irrepressible adolescent spirit can never be witnessed without some regret.

ADVERTISEMENT

1978 AMC Gremlin GT

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1978 AMC Gremlin GT worst muscle cars
Instagram/@zombiecotija
Instagram/@zombiecotija
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMC Gremlin is an ugly muscle car that was made in the 1970s. It was slow, and only a limited amount were built. The car was essentially a carbon copy of other models in the same time period and had little going for it to make it any different.

ADVERTISEMENT

During its initial release year, the Gremlin had only 120 horsepower even with its V8 engine. Facing declining sales, AMC discontinued the Gremlin after 1978 and made the AMC Spirit its main model.

ADVERTISEMENT

1982 Ford Thunderbird

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
thunderbird landau
Mr.Choppers/Wikimedia Commons
Mr.Choppers/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Always one of the more luxurious Ford models, the Thunderbird has a reputation for being a classic muscle car. The model year from 1980 to 1982 was one of the worst generations for the Thunderbird because of the changes that Ford made to its muscle and performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

As large as the car was, the 1982 Ford Thunderbird was only equipped with 120 horsepower even with having a V8 engine. Fortunately, Ford made major changes to the next generation of Thunderbird to resurge the model among drivers. Pictured is the Town Landau edition.

ADVERTISEMENT

1971-1975 Ford Maverick Grabber

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Ford Maverick Grabber worst muscle cars
Instagram/@autocrusade
Instagram/@autocrusade
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Maverick Grabber, which is based on the 1960 Ford Falcon was a muscle car made by Ford. It was designed to be affordable for consumers and cheap to build so that it could be easily mass-produced and manufactured.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although it was designed with good intentions, the car was overall just bland and nothing remarkable. The Grabber was essentially a regurgitation of a decade-old car with a new paint job and stripes.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980-85 Chevrolet Citation X-11

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Chevrolet Citation worst muscle cars
Instagram/@portlandparkedcars
Instagram/@portlandparkedcars
ADVERTISEMENT

One of the biggest issues with the Citation was that it had a lot of recalls and generally considered unsafe. The Citation was designed to be a smaller front-wheel-drive muscle car that was only available in the four-speed overdrive or the three-speed automatic transmission.

ADVERTISEMENT

Even with some of the updates that Chevrolet made to the Citation including its new steering rack and stabilizer bars, the car was still a fail overall.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980-81 Delorean Dmc-12

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Delorean worst muscle cars
Faik Geci/ Barcroft Media / Barcroft Media via Getty Images
Faik Geci/ Barcroft Media / Barcroft Media via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Outside of the car being really popular for being featured in the Back to the Future movie franchise, the car itself was a real dud. The designer of the car wanted to make something that was futuristic and unlike anything else on the road and came up with the Delorean.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although it was classified as a muscle car, it only got 130 horsepower and took over 10 seconds to go from 0 to 60. Even with its cinematic popularity, the Delorean didn't sell well and the company went bankrupt in 1984.

ADVERTISEMENT

1978-80 Oldsmobile 442

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
442
Wikimedia Commons
Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Based on a classic muscle car design, the Oldsmobile 442 got its name from the makeup of the car including the car's four-barrel carburetor, from speed transmission and two twin exhaust pipes.

ADVERTISEMENT

What made the Oldsmobile so bad in 1978 was its lack of options available to the buyer. The Oldsmobile was only sold in the "aeroback" body style and its 5.0-L engine only produced 145 horsepower making for an even duller ride.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980 Dodge Aspen R/T

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1980 Dodge Aspen worst muscle cars
Instagram/@boostedcaravan
Instagram/@boostedcaravan
ADVERTISEMENT

The Dodge Aspen was one of the worst Dodge to ever come out. The car had back to back recalls, and issues with the body rusting really badly.

ADVERTISEMENT

The engine of the car was similar to that of the Chevrolet Camaro of the time and it was offered to buyers in both an R/T and Super Coupe trim level. Dodge made an attempt to correct the mistakes that they made but it was too late and the car ultimately failed.

ADVERTISEMENT

1977 Pontiac Trans Am

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Pontiac Trans Am worst muscle cars
Photo by Mike Windle/Getty Images for SXSW
Photo by Mike Windle/Getty Images for SXSW
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1977 Pontiac Trans Am felt like a revelation at the time it was released. It was a throwback to classic Pony cars and helped rejuvenate sales of the struggling market.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unfortunately, Pontiac didn't pay enough attention to what was under the hood. The base model maxed out at 180 horsepower, which didn't really justify the price-tag. For a few extra thousand dollars, the engine could be upgraded, but the only real reason to buy this car was for its looks, not its performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980-81 Mercury Capri Turbo RS

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Mercury Capri Turbo RS worst muscle cars
Instagram/@fomoco_gnatsum
Instagram/@fomoco_gnatsum
ADVERTISEMENT

The Mercury Capri was originally a part of Ford Europe before being brought over to the US to be sold alongside Ford's other muscle cars. Sold for over three decades, the Mercury Capri has gone under name changes as well.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the worst things about the Capri is that it is very unreliable and was known to break down a lot. Because of the car's bad reputation, it was lowered in price which helped boost its sales in Europe.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980 Chevrolet Corvette California 305

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Chevrolet Corvette worst muscle cars
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

With the 1980 Corvette California 305 came high federal emission requirements that halted its glory. Regulations required that the Corvette have a smaller engine so the plans to put in a larger engine were halted.

ADVERTISEMENT

The newly updated V8 engine now only put out 180 horsepower instead of what was originally projected. After the federal regulations, Chevy found another way to increase the horsepower of the engine by the next model year.

ADVERTISEMENT

1968-70 Pontiac Tempest

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Pontiac Tempest worst muscle cars
Instagram/@oldcar_spotting
Instagram/@oldcar_spotting
ADVERTISEMENT

This second generation of the Pontiac Tempest was supposed to attract new drivers with its updated body style. The first generation of the Tempest was publicly accepted and in an effort to improve it, Pontiac ended up ruining the second generation altogether.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bad sales and negative feedback led to the Tempest's short stint on the market and it only lasted 2 years before being discontinued and the Tempest was taken over by Le Mans.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ford Mustang II Ghia

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Ford Mustang II Ghia worst muscle cars
Instagram/@samvbatt
Instagram/@samvbatt
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Mustang II Ghia was the second generation of the Ford Mustang. After the success of the first Ford Mustang, Ford tried to desperately follow up with the Ford Mustang II but fell flat.

ADVERTISEMENT

It was based on the Pinto platform, and was a lot slower and heavier than its predecessor. The Mustang's style wasn't reminiscent of its first model either and it looked a lot different in the worst ways including its square boxy shape.

ADVERTISEMENT

1975 Chevrolet Corvette

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1975 Chevrolet Corvette worst muscle cars
Instagram/@thenuttycarguy
Instagram/@thenuttycarguy
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1970s for the Chevrolet Corvette were some of its worst years ever. In the 1970s, the Corvette would see little changes to its body and interior but also would get a smaller and slower engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

The engine it had then was only 15 more horsepower than the engine that the Corvette had two decades prior. The Corvette itself looked really stunning but because of its drop in horsepower, not much can be said for how it held up.

ADVERTISEMENT

1982 Chevrolet Camaro

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1982 Chevrolet Camaro worst muscle cars
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is an example of how even with all of the best designing and planning, some of the best cars can still fail and have bad years.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the biggest issues with the 1982 Camaro was its engine, even with its more powerful 5.0-Liter engine, the Camaro still couldn't break 200 horsepower. It took this Camaro 20 seconds just to go from 0 to 60 seconds which was just as slow then as it is now.

ADVERTISEMENT

1983-1987 Dodge Charger

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
496569
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1980s weren't good for the Dodge Charger. Counting on the popularity of hatchback cars at the time, Dodge gave buyers the option to buy the Charger as a hatchback model which didn't suit its audience.

ADVERTISEMENT

To make matters worse, they included this hatchback model with a 4-cylinder engine that lacked in performance. Carroll Shelby tried to improve the Charger by adding a turbocharged engine but even that didn't help.

ADVERTISEMENT

Pontiac Grand Prix 2+2

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Pontiac Grand Prix worst muscle cars
Instagram/@markus_4475
Instagram/@markus_4475
ADVERTISEMENT

Although the Pontiac Grand Prix is named after a car race, its 2+2 model was anything but race-worthy. Alongside the Monte Carlo, the Pontiac Grand Prix was barely able to hold its own on the road with only 150 horsepower.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Grand Prix also didn't have much to offer in terms of its looks. The body of the car wasn't very unique in comparison to other models at the time and overall was boring.

ADVERTISEMENT

2004-2005 Chevrolet Impala SS

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
2005 Chevrolet Impala worst muscle cars
Instagram/@summit_ls4
Instagram/@summit_ls4
ADVERTISEMENT

When the Chevrolet Impala SS was first introduced in 1961, it was regarded as one of the coolest cars available. The 2004-2005 Impala model was one of the worst that came out in the Impala's history because of its lack of creativity and innovation.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet made no real changes to the car to improve its look nor did they upgrade the engine. If you were buying one of these cars, it basically borrowed the Lumina body and had an outdated engine that had no changes from last year.

ADVERTISEMENT

Buick Regal Sport Coupe

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Buick Regal worst muscle cars
Photo by Aaron Davidson/Getty Images
Photo by Aaron Davidson/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The Buick Regal Sport Coupe was a bland and boring muscle car during the late 1970s when the car was available and sold. They came with a standard V6 engine but weren't very fast or powerful.

ADVERTISEMENT

While they were publicly accepted because of their affordability, as a muscle car they continued to underperform against competitors. Buick is completely revamping the Regal Sport Coupe and will debut its latest model in 2020.

ADVERTISEMENT

Dodge Magnum

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Dodge Magnum worst muscle cars
Photo by John B. Carnett/Bonnier Corporation via Getty Images
Photo by John B. Carnett/Bonnier Corporation via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Dodge's performance station wagon has never truly been that amazing of a car. The car had a rear-wheel drive and a 5.9-L V8 Hemi engine. Despite all of its bells and whistles, the car was still extremely heavy and ugly.

ADVERTISEMENT

Drivers couldn't enjoy all that the Magnum had to offer because its weight slowed it down even with the Hemi engine. To add fuel to the flame, who would want to drive a performance station wagon?

ADVERTISEMENT

AMC Hornet AMX

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AMC Hornet worst muscle cars
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
Photo by National Motor Museum/Heritage Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

The AMC Hornet was another cheap car that was made to be economically friendly and attract drivers who wanted an entry-level muscle car. The Hornet was not too impressive of a model and was mostly plain and too familiar with the other cars on the market.

ADVERTISEMENT

The AMX option was supposed to add more horsepower to the car but even with the AMX label, the Hornet only got 120 horsepower, which was slow even for the 1970s.

ADVERTISEMENT

1974 Chevrolet Nova SS

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1974 Chevrolet Nova worst muscle cars
Instagram/@autoantigo
Instagram/@autoantigo
ADVERTISEMENT

This was a cheap muscle car that was really popular in the 1970s. The "SS" badging meant that a car came with a performance package and was faster than the other trim levels in the lineup.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet decided to remove the performance package and instead made the "SS" badging an appearance package only. With the appearance package, Chevrolet didn't anything new or special to offer meaning the only thing buyers could expect was a black grille and badging.

ADVERTISEMENT

1978-1983 Dodge Challenger

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1983 Dodge Challenger worst muscle cars
Photo by Dünzlullstein bild via Getty Images
Photo by Dünzlullstein bild via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Dodge only brought the Challenger back in the 1970s and 1980s for a short period of time but during that time made some mistakes. In 1974, the Challenger was a fierce competitor on the drag strip and then Dodge discontinued it.

ADVERTISEMENT

When Dodge decided to try and bring it back in 1978, they rebadged it as a Mitsubishi and it had substantially less horsepower than its predecessors until Dodge released the updated Challengers in the late 2000s.

ADVERTISEMENT

1977-1979 Mercury Cougar XR7

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Mercury Cougar XR7 worst muscle cars
Instagram/@somedayclassics
Instagram/@somedayclassics
ADVERTISEMENT

The Mercury Cougar was marketed as a luxury muscle car that was also affordable. It had a boxy shape and the interior was almost identical to that of a Ford Mustang at the same time.

ADVERTISEMENT

One of the biggest changes that the Mercury Cougar saw in the late 1970s was a huge weight gain. This extra weight made the car ultimately slower and Mercury Cougar struggled to keep its muscle car reputation shortly after that.

ADVERTISEMENT

1979 Ford Mustang

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1979 Ford Mustang worst muscle cars
Instagram/@mrree75
Instagram/@mrree75
ADVERTISEMENT

Before the Ford Mustang became what it was today, it started out as this square boxy slower car. Barely resembling anything close to the modern Ford Mustang, this model didn't have nearly the same level of crib appeal or muscle that its newest successors have.

ADVERTISEMENT

This Ford Mustang had only 140 horsepower to start even with its 5.0-L V8 engine. Over time Ford would add a bigger engine and change the look of the Mustang to attract more drivers.

ADVERTISEMENT

2006-10 Dodge Charger SE

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Dodge Charger SE worst muscle cars
Instagram/@jenna_mopar.monster
Instagram/@jenna_mopar.monster
ADVERTISEMENT

The 2006-2010 Charger was the start of a new era for the muscle car brand. Dodge completely redesigned the body and style of the Charger and it was met with a mixed reception from the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

The SE was at the bottom of the list of popularity as an entry model because of the faster and more attractive trim levels available. Dodge made note of the dissatisfaction and the next generation in 2011 came back with a better base-level engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Chevrolet Monza

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Monza
Denver Post via Getty Images
Denver Post via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

One of the least popular cars on the list, the Chevrolet Monza was a performance compact car built on the Chevrolet Vega platform. It was sold in the mid-1970s into the 1980s but was never mass-marketed or well-received by the public.

ADVERTISEMENT

Though the Monza was a performance car, it was one of the slowest cars ever built on the Chevy lineup. A few years into it selling, Chevy dropped the option to buy the V8 engine and then the car was discontinued shortly after.

ADVERTISEMENT

1996-1998 Ford Mustang

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1998 Ford Mustang worst muscle cars
Instagram/@98snwhat
Instagram/@98snwhat
ADVERTISEMENT

Where this generation of Mustang fell was in the styling of it. By trying to keep a retro look, Ford missed the opportunity to compete with a newer looking model or newer engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

Futuristic cars were popular during the late 1990s but Ford decided on a different direction for this generation. Fortunately, Ford decided to completely overhaul the look of the Mustang and made massive improvements to its body style and performance in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

2010 Ford Mustang

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
2010 Ford Mustang worst muscle cars
Instagram/@ask.mustang
Instagram/@ask.mustang
ADVERTISEMENT

The 2010 Ford Mustang was a part of the fifth generation of the muscle car and its body style was one of the most popular. While Ford was making updates to the outside of the Mustang, it was also making changes to the engine of the Mustang.

ADVERTISEMENT

Instead of improving the engine for production, Ford made the Mustang stagnant by choosing not to replace the engine 4.0-L V6 or 4.6-L V8 engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

1971 Ford Pinto

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Pinto
ISC Archives/CQ-Roll Call Group via Getty Images
ISC Archives/CQ-Roll Call Group via Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

Considered one of the worst cars ever by Time Magazine, the Ford Pinto was a car that was anything but amazing. For starters, this car started off with only 75 horsepower which in the 1970s was still very slow for any car, let alone a muscle car.

ADVERTISEMENT

In addition to that, the gas tank could easily rupture, which was potentially dangerous if the driver was involved in a rear-end collision.

ADVERTISEMENT

1974 Pontiac Ventura

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1974_Pontiac_Ventura
Spantax/Wikimedia Commons
Spantax/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

In the '70s and '80s, Pontiac had the market cornered on muscle cars. Not every year was perfect for the automaker, though, and 1974 proved especially troubling. Declining sales of the GTO led Pontiac to create a special GTO trim for the Ventura.

ADVERTISEMENT

The new Ventura topped out at 200 horsepower, which didn't satisfy the muscle junkies on the market. Some even refused to acknowledge that it was allowed to be called a muscle car!

ADVERTISEMENT

1977 Chevy Monza Mirage

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Let's check out the 1977 Monza Mirage! 0-55 screenshot
Carlisle Events/YouTube
Carlisle Events/YouTube
ADVERTISEMENT

When Chevy first introduced the Mirage, it was a hit. It was a compact car with tons of added features and it was highly marketable. Looking to expand on the market, Chevy teamed up with Michigan Auto Techniques to turn it into a muscle car, giving birth to the Monza Mirage.

ADVERTISEMENT

The first issue with the Monza Mirage, which has been a consistent theme on this list, was the horsepower. The engine maxed out at 145 horsepower at the most optimal conditions. Chevy stopped production after 4,000 cars were made.

ADVERTISEMENT

1982 Chevy Camaro Iron Duke

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
image
Bonhams
Bonhams
ADVERTISEMENT

Few muscle cars in the '80s were more of a disappointment than the 1982 Chevy Camaro Iron Duke. Undeniably a beautiful car, Chevy underwhelmed under the hood with a severely underpowered four-cylinder engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

The engine, to its credit, was very durable. But that didn't really matter to consumers who wanted the car to be capable of more than 90 horsepower. While the engine failed in the Iron Duke, it wound up becoming a staple in Chevy station wagons.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980 Ford Mustang

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1980_ford_mustang_20220510_180020-54435.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

For how popular and beloved the Ford Mustang is, it's surprising to it continuing to appear on this list. The 1980 Mustang was a complete swing and miss by the American automaker, with Motor 1 writing:

ADVERTISEMENT

"The base model for 1980 came with a 2.3-liter four-cylinder producing a less-than-exciting 88 horsepower and 119 pound-feet of torque. Acceleration could best be described as lackadaisical. The styling wasn't very exciting either, particularly the notchback."

ADVERTISEMENT

1980 Mercury Capri RS

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1625px-1980_Mercury_Capri_(6523073155)_(cropped)
Spanish Coches/Wikimedia Commons
Spanish Coches/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Another muscle car from the '80s that completely missed the mark, the 1980 Mercury Capri RS was such a mess that not even upgrades could save it. When a car that is supposed to be fast can't go over 100 miles per hour, you know you have a problem.

ADVERTISEMENT

As Vocal Media writes, "The three-door RS model had a 2.3 liter, turbocharged engine that might sound impressive, but actually only gave the car a pathetic 88 horsepower. Worse, its top speed was only 99 miles per hour."

ADVERTISEMENT

1984 Mercury Cougar XR7

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1983_mercury_cougar_20240806_092537-37110.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

The perfect muscle car for your grandmother, the Mercury Cougar XR7 surprisingly couldn't find a consumer base. Gearheads turned away from the boxy car that didn't look intimidating or particularly fast.

ADVERTISEMENT

Motor 1 described it this way, "With its grandma-chic styling, the Cougar was boring looking even by the standards of the time, though. It was a sign of forward progress, but this Mercury was still a fairly awful muscle machine."

ADVERTISEMENT

1996 Ford Thunderbird LX

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1996_ford_thunderbird_20240615_101714-32246.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

Ford made one of the more awkward-looking muscle cars with the 1996 Ford Thunderbird. It was just an odd-looking vehicle, though. It was also underpowered and was the beginning of the end of the once-iconic car.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Motor 1, "In 1996, Ford discontinued the Super Coupe trim and its powerful supercharged V6 engine, which made 230 horsepower and 330 pound-feet of torque. Instead, there was a 3.8-liter V6 making 140 hp or a V8 making 205 hp. With just two engine choices, the demise of the Thunderbird was near before an awkward revival five years later in 2002."

ADVERTISEMENT

1968-72 Chevy El Camino SS 454

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1968 Chevrolet Preview - El Camino...
Bob D'Olivo/The Enthusiast Network via Getty Images/Getty Images
Bob D'Olivo/The Enthusiast Network via Getty Images/Getty Images
ADVERTISEMENT

There is something purely exciting to gearheads when they see a Chevy emblazoned with a SS and 454 on it. When it came to the 1968-72 model years for the El Camino, those marks were just for show.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sure, the El Camino was powerful given its LS6 V8 engine that produced 365 horsepower. The problem was most of that power was used by the rear of the car, which made it better suited for towing that outpacing other muscle cars on the freeway.

ADVERTISEMENT

1965 Chrysler 300L

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Greg Gjerdingen 65_Chrysler_300-L_(5976036603)
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1965 Chrysler 300L marked the end of an era for Chrysler's once-legendary muscle car line – the Letter Series. With a restyled body and crisp lines, it represented a shift in Chrysler's design direction… but lacked the performance to match its premium price tag.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 300L was powered by a 413-cubic-inch V8 which, while respectable, couldn't compete with the performance of more potent muscle cars. The car did 0-60 in 8.8 seconds and quarter-mile in 17.3 seconds. Chrysler tried to return the 300 Letter Series to its roots with the 300M, featuring a 426 Hemi engine, but it was eventually canceled.

ADVERTISEMENT

1967 AMC Rambler Rebel

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
AMC Rebel - Bonhams
Bonhams
Bonhams
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1967 AMC Rambler Rebel attempted to break free from its "economy car" image with a 114-inch wheelbase, sweeping rooflines, and a "coke-bottle" design. It offered a 343 cubic-inch V8 engine and a redesigned rear suspension for a smoother ride… and was available in coupe, convertible, and station wagon styles.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Rebel, however, fell short of muscle car expectations. Its engine lacked the power and aggression of top rivals of the era, making it unable to leave a lasting impact.

ADVERTISEMENT

1963 Dodge Dart

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1963_Dodge_Dart_Greg Gjerdingen)
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1963 Dodge Dart marked a shift from the Lancer nameplate and was marketed as a "senior compact," offering a longer wheelbase for more rear-seat space. The Dart featured a comfortable interior, a more refined design… and came in a variety of trims.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, its engine options failed to meet muscle car expectations. The standard 170 cubic-inch slant-six offered just 101 horsepower, while the optional 225 cubic-inch slant-six delivered 145 horsepower. Although the introduction of the 273 cubic-inch V8 in 1964 improved power, it came too late to secure the Dart's place among performance enthusiasts.

ADVERTISEMENT

1964 Ford Fairlane Thunderbolt

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1965_ford_thunderbolt_thuderbolt_031_-web-30746.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Fairlane Thunderbolt combined the lightweight Fairlane body with a potent 427 cubic-inch V8 engine, conservatively rated at 425 hp. Designed purely for speed, the Thunderbolt featured fiberglass panels, Plexiglass windows, and race-focused modifications to shed weight.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, these modifications rendered the Thunderbolt impractical for anything other than racing. The car had minimal interior comfort, as a number of essential features were stripped… leaving it without basics like a radio, heater, or even a passenger-side wiper. The Thunderbolt just belonged to the track.

ADVERTISEMENT

1962-1964 Dodge 330

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1756132_34
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

Positioned above the Dart, the Dodge 330 offered a solid, mid-size option in the early 1960s. It featured unibody construction, multiple engine choices from the base 225 Slant-Six to the powerful 426 Max Wedge, and a practical design with conveniences like front foam cushions and a rear armrest.

ADVERTISEMENT

The styling was, however, too plain… and the basic trim lacked performance, due to which the vehicle couldn't capture widespread attention. Dodge made these for just three model years, from 1962 to 1964.

ADVERTISEMENT

1962-1965 Chevrolet Chevy II/Nova

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Chevrolet_Chevy_II_Nova_(4)_(cropped)
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The Chevy II/Nova began as a compact, economical alternative to Chevrolet's larger models. Initially, it was offered with a variety of inline-four and six-cylinder engines but by 1965, Chevrolet had upgraded the Nova with a 327 V8, which allowed it to compete with other muscle cars on the market.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the Nova faced stiff competition from Chevrolet's own Chevelle, which quickly overtook its sales. In 1965, Nova sales dropped as consumers increasingly preferred the Chevelle's larger size, sleeker design, and wider array of powerful engine options. The Nova also lacked the handling and appeal of the revised 1965 Corvair.

ADVERTISEMENT

1965-1967 Plymouth Satellite

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
404531
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

The Plymouth Satellite offered a range of V8 engine options, including the powerful 426 "Commando" and later the 426 Street Hemi in 1966. The 1965 Satellite featured a stylish front end, bucket seats, and a center console, making it an appealing choice for those looking for both performance and comfort.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, despite its performance capabilities, the Satellite faced stiff competition from other muscle cars of the era with more niche following. Moreover, its base models struggled to stand out in a market that was increasingly focused on powerful, aggressive-looking cars.

ADVERTISEMENT

1968 Oldsmobile 4-4-2

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
image
Bonhams
Bonhams
ADVERTISEMENT

A standalone model for 1968, the Oldsmobile 4-4-2 featured a 400 CID engine based on the 455 V8, designed to deliver more torque at lower RPMs. However, despite its rating of 350 horsepower for manual versions (325 for automatics), the car's milder camshaft limited high-end performance.

ADVERTISEMENT

The W-30 variant offered some improvement with its ram-air intake and 360-horsepower rating, but its potential was slightly overshadowed by design compromises that favored smooth power delivery over muscle car dominance.

ADVERTISEMENT

1968-1971 Dodge Super Bee

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
211789
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

Featuring distinctive "Bee" emblems, heavy-duty suspension, and a Hurst shifter for its 4-speed manual transmission, the Super Bee brought a sportier, high-performance option to Dodge's lineup. It was initially offered with a 383 Magnum engine or a 426 Hemi… and later introduced the 440 Six-Pack engine, which made it one of the most powerful muscle cars of the era.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Super Bee, however, faced a number of issues. Its higher price and slightly heavier build made it less competitive against the Plymouth's successful Road Runner. Moreover, Dodge's new "bumble bee wings" front-end design introduced in 1970 divided opinions, and led to a significant drop in sales. The Super Bee was discontinued in 1971.

ADVERTISEMENT

1977 Pontiac Can Am

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
3_Can_Ams_at_Norwalk_30th_Anniv
TropicDave/Wikimedia Commons
TropicDave/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1977 Pontiac Can Am aimed to bring race-inspired flair to the streets with its mid-size LeMans base, muscle-focused Pontiac 400 engine, and signature Trans Am shaker hood scoop. However, it was rated at just 200 horsepower.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, the Can Am production had to cease due to unexpected manufacturing issues. Its launch timing combined with the modest powertrain compared to earlier muscle cars meant the Can Am would never stand out. The car was discontinued after just one year.

ADVERTISEMENT

1968-1969 Ford Torino

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
292045
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

Ford introduced the Torino in 1968 as a premium version of the Fairlane, aiming to capture muscle car enthusiasts with its variety of powerful engines. The Torino GT, especially, was offered with an array of options, including the 428 Cobra Jet V8 engine.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the base models started with a six-cylinder engine, which hurt the car's image among performance-focused buyers. Additionally, the design changes from 1968 to 1969 were minimal, leaving the car less appealing in a quickly evolving muscle car market.

ADVERTISEMENT

1975–1979 Chrysler Cordoba

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1623px-1979_Chrysler_Cordoba_(18176649968)
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Debuting in 1975 as a luxurious personal coupe, the Chrysler Cordoba quickly achieved success due to its premium styling and high-end interior options. However, its popularity waned by the late 1970s when critics found its new design "tacky" and less refined.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, the Cordoba's hefty 3,700-pound frame, combined with large V8 engines, proved increasingly problematic as gas prices rose and fuel economy standards tightened. Additionally, Chrysler’s own smaller LeBaron coupe offered similar features in a more efficient package, further eating into Cordoba’s sales.

ADVERTISEMENT

1970 AMC Rebel Machine

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1190635_1
Mecum
Mecum
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1970 AMC Rebel Machine boasted a 390-cubic-inch V8 engine, producing up to 340 horsepower and 430 lb-ft of torque. But despite this power, its appeal was hindered by design quirks, especially due to the limited performance by the stock cam.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although an aftermarket cam was available, it required modifications that AMC couldn't factory-install due to emissions standards. Moreover, while the Machine’s suspension was strengthened with a rear sway bar and stiffer springs, its tall stance led to excessive weight shifting that impacted handling during high-speed maneuvers. These issues held it back from becoming a muscle car icon.

ADVERTISEMENT

1973–1974 Oldsmobile Omega

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1973_Olds_Omega
Dave_7/Wikimedia Commons
Dave_7/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Introduced in 1973 as Oldsmobile's compact option, the Omega struggled to distinguish itself from its Chevrolet Nova base. While it did feature unique touches like a split "waterfall" grille and woodgrain interior trim, the Omega’s design and mechanics largely mirrored the Nova’s, making it feel more like a rebadged clone than a distinctive model.

ADVERTISEMENT

And though the V8 “Rocket” engine provided decent power, it didn’t offer enough to set the Omega apart from other compact cars. The car got minor updates in recent years, but they did little to enhance its appeal.

ADVERTISEMENT

1970–1976 Plymouth Duster

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1621px-1970_Plymouth_Valiant_Duster_340_(27366262585)_(cropped)
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
Greg Gjerdingen/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

A sleek, semi-fastback coupe based on the Valiant, the Plymouth Duster provided an affordable entry point into the muscle car scene. With its unique design, steeper windshield rake, and a performance-oriented Duster 340 model, it appealed to young buyers seeking style and speed on a budget.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the Duster struggled to maintain popularity as competition increased. While attractive initially, its older platform began to feel outdated, especially as buyers sought more refined and upscale vehicles.

ADVERTISEMENT

1968–1972 Buick Skylark

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Buick_Skylark_(1968)_ 15847086795
SG2012/Wikimedia Commons
SG2012/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1968 Buick Skylark saw a significant redesign, with a semi-fastback appearance for a more streamlined look and the introduction of federally mandated safety features. However, it lacked the uniqueness of other mid-sized GM models, often feeling like a less distinct option in a crowded market.

ADVERTISEMENT

Moreover, the shift from a V6 to a Chevrolet-sourced inline-six engine left some buyers feeling that the Skylark didn't fully live up to its potential. The Skylark’s performance was also overshadowed by its more powerful Gran Sport counterpart.

ADVERTISEMENT

1980–1983 Dodge Mirada

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1982_dodge_mirada_1602877392565ef66e7dff9f981982_dodge_mirada_16028773918495d565ef6cfe777f2-fea7-4853-a1ee-312ed1f1fc9c-nMfxlE-scaled.jpg
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

The Dodge Mirada was marketed as a sporty personal luxury car, offering a variety of roof options and an available "sport handling package." While it had potential with the 360 V8 engine, the base engine options and limited production choices led to fewer and fewer sales every successive year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Mirada's performance did not sustain its sporty image over time, especially when Chrysler stopped offering the 360 V8 after 1980. This, combined with a lack of updates and inconsistent model features throughout its run, led to its demise by 1983.

ADVERTISEMENT

1972–1976 Mercury Montego

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1440px-Mercury_Montego_GT_green
Dave_7/Wikimedia Commons
Dave_7/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

The 1972 Mercury Montego initially impressed with its move to body-on-frame construction, diverse engine options, and new Montego GT variant. However, this success was short-lived, as the 1973 oil crisis quickly shifted demand toward more fuel-efficient models.

ADVERTISEMENT

After 1973, the Montego faced increasing competition within Mercury's own lineup, as the larger Cougar and newly popular Mercury Monarch ate into its sales. By 1977, the Montego was entirely phased out, as buyers moved toward smaller, more economical vehicles amidst rising fuel costs and changing market demands.

ADVERTISEMENT

1974–1976 Ford Elite

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1976_ford_gran-torino_1976-ford-elite-6424-2-00416.jp
Bring a Trailer
Bring a Trailer
ADVERTISEMENT

The Ford Elite, initially launched as the "Gran Torino Elite" in 1974, was Ford's response to the growing market for mid-size personal luxury coupes. Despite its appeal as a more affordable Thunderbird alternative with upscale styling and comfort, it struggled to establish its own identity.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Elite's sales were strong initially but couldn't keep up with market shifts, particularly when Ford downsized the Thunderbird in 1977, placing it on a more modern platform at a more competitive price. In fact, the introduction of the smaller Thunderbird was what led Ford to discontinue the Elite.

ADVERTISEMENT

1973–1976 Chevrolet Chevelle Laguna

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
1974Laguna
Simon M. Canasi/Wikimedia Commons
Simon M. Canasi/Wikimedia Commons
ADVERTISEMENT

Produced from 1973 to 1976, the Chevrolet Chevelle Laguna was intended as a high-end, performance-oriented addition to the Chevelle lineup… and was available in coupe, sedan and station wagon configuration.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Laguna's semi-fastback roofline, luxurious interiors, and the hefty 454 V8 option seemed promising, yet it was outclassed by other GM models and muscle car competitors. The car lacked a consistent identity, which led to lukewarm sales and a quick exit from production by 1976.